Representation

Reflections are everywhere - in crystal blue lakes and shining, marble surfaces, in the glass of towering skyscrapers and the concave lenses of ever-present cameras. They capture my thinking and mesmerize me, enticing me to look again because there's more in the picture!

Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mirror_image

From the early portions of the Old Testament, it appeared that God selected a people to represent him on the Earth.  But several hundred years later, the Prophets very plainly told the Jews they had not lived up to their calling.  Some prophets told them they had lost their chance.  God was moving on without them.  Other prophets said that although the Jews had totally squandered their chance to represent God on the Earth, he would grant them a second chance if they asked for forgiveness and changed their ways.  This second series of prophecies were what the Jews put their hope in.  So, they desperately tried to cleanse themselves of their weaknesses and live better lives. Over several hundred years and switches in world empires later, they thought they had accomplished this.  By the time Augustus Caesar became emperor of Rome and all of its conquered provinces, the Jews felt very much like they again represented God on the Earth, especially if put against the likes of the barbaric, evil, and bloodthirsty Romans.
But during the reign of Augustus something happened in the Jewish province of Rome that should have altered the entire direction of Jewish beliefs.  The Jews' whole world should have been rocked and people there should have repented of their impoverished representation of the One whose power created the Earth and directed the destinies of countries on the Earth.  God's chosen one that they all thought would come at some point in their history actually did come.  Their entire belief system and their very existence depended on the appearance of this messiah, but the Jews, especially their leaders, didn't acknowledge his presence or his teachings.  And they were definitely privy to his presence in their country.
70 years after this event in Judea, Luke traveled through the same realms of the world that Paul traveled, even traveling with Paul at times.  He saw what Paul saw.  The Jews still felt that they represented God wherever they had their communities. They ran Paul and his associates out of several towns and confronted Paul at nearly every turn for presenting the idea that they had missed their messiah, God's chosen.  And all in full view of the Romans, who thought that the Jews were a really obstinate, arrogant group, rebellious to the core, not the representatives of God on Earth.  
Luke knew how strongly the Jews denied that they had lost the opportunity to accept God's change by accepting Jesus' message, so he wrote stories such as the ones found in Luke 15 where Jesus told parables of God's patience to accept them if they wanted to be found.  But Luke also wanted the Jews to know their time had expired to represent God, and that they had had good warning. So, he included a story in his writings (Chapter 16) where Jesus dealt with the issue of a time when the Jewish leadership had been presented a chance and a choice to quit misrepresenting God.  Jesus' story was aimed directly at the majority party of the ruling sect in Jerusalem, the Sadducees.  Those leaders had been wealthy.  The people hadn't been.  And the people had seen the rulers accumulating money and power in a rather corrupt manner.
.Jesus had not been coy.  He told them that a wealthy house owner heard his manager was corrupt, so the owner called him into account for his actions.  The manager knew he would be canned because he was corrupt (from getting more money than he should have from people to line his own pockets and from treating those people poorly). The manager  went to all the owner's debtors and reduced their debts so that when the owner did fire him, they would take him in.  Thus, Jesus directed his words straight to the leaders who had cut deals with the Romans to retain their leadership and to keep their purses full.
Verse 9
Καὶ ἐγὼ ὑμῖν λέγω, ἑαυτοῖς ποιήσατε φίλους ἐκ τοῦ μαμωνᾶ τῆς ἀδικίας, ἵνα ὅταν ἐκλίπῃ δέξωνται ὑμᾶς εἰς τὰς αἰωνίους σκηνάς
(I say, go ahead and make friends of those you overcharged for your own gain and have now short-changed the house owner with.  When it disappears, those are the friends who will be the ones to accept you into their vain and empty lives for the rest of your days.)
 The Jewish leaders should have been interested in hearing about acceptance that would lead to a place for them for the rest of their days.  They had perpetuated a belief system that they alone had represented God on the Earth, and they would be rewarded for it.  The regular Jews understood that God wanted their undying love.  They saw God's heart.

But the leaders didn't see the same thing. They had dismissed the prophets that had told them otherwise and embraced the ones that told them they had been reinstated as the guardians of God on the Earth.  Jesus was telling their leaders otherwise.  But, they couldn't hear it.  Instead, they wanted to play games by quibbling over whether or not there even was a place to spend the rest of one's days.  The Sadducees, the majority party, had said no, the Pharisees, the minority, said yes.  And the two ruling sects were split on how to handle money as well.  Sadducees were aristocratic and didn't let religion get in the way of business while Pharisees placed a little more value on the use of money collected in God's name, namely the tithe and supporting temple worship.  But the Sadducees held the majority.  So, Jesus leveled his charge at them.  First, there was a place to spend the rest of a person's days, and second, their value of money from corruption in business was a determining factor in receiving that place.  
Verse 10
Ὁ πιστὸς ἐν ἐλαχίστῳ καὶ ἐν πολλῷ πιστός ἐστιν, καὶ ὁ ἐν ἐλαχίστῳ ἄδικος καὶ ἐν πολλῷ ἄδικός ἐστιν
(The  person who is trustworthy with a little is trustworthy with a lot.  And the one who is corrupt with a little is corrupt with a lot.)
Verse 11
εἰ οὖν ἐν τῷ ἀδίκῳ μαμωνᾷ πιστοὶ οὐκ ἐγένεσθε, τὸ ἀληθινὸν τίς ὑμῖν πιστεύσει
(So, if you can't be trustworthy in obtaining your riches through honest means, who will trust you with true riches? )
With clarity that even the Sadducees could not twist, Jesus tells them 
Verse 12
καὶ εἰ ἐν τῷ ἀλλοτρίῳ πιστοὶ οὐκ ἐγένεσθε, τὸ ὑμέτερον τίς ὑμῖν δώσει
(and if you can't be trustworthy with someone else's affairs, who will give you what could have been rightfully yours?)
The statement is in question form, but the question was not asking for information.  It was rhetorical and the apparent answer could not have been misunderstood by the majority group.  They had forgotten that the rule of reciprocation applied to a higher power than Rome.  God was on his throne and was faithful to those who reflected that principle.  

And, there was one more thing.  Although the statements Jesus used about corruption and wealth were metaphorical in his parable, he didn't want them to construe his metaphor into a claim that the story's moral didn't apply to their misrepresentation of God.  So Jesus didn't leave it unsaid.
Verse 13
Οὐδεὶς οἰκέτης δύναται δυσὶν κυρίοις δουλεύειν· ἢ γὰρ τὸν ἕνα μισήσει καὶ τὸν ἕτερον ἀγαπήσει, ἢ ἑνὸς ἀνθέξεται καὶ τοῦ ἑτέρου καταφρονήσει. οὐ δύνασθε θεῷ δουλεύειν καὶ μαμωνᾷ
(It is impossible for a household servant to serve two masters.  He will hate one and love the other or he will side with one and look contemptuously on the other. It is impossible to serve God and corruptly amassing wealth.)
And even though Jesus' statements were about faithfulness to God and the fact that God was rejecting those who represented him for their unfaithfulness, Jesus used another word to make it clear what their position was in the equation.  He didn't mince words.  His analogy was not of a loving father giving a message to his sons.  It wasn't of a loving God trying to woo his wayward chosen people.  It was of a house owner and his servant.  The Sadducees got it.  They were serving their ill-begotten money as if they were servants in its house.  They were not servants in God's house.
Jesus' words from Luke come at a time between what the prophets said and what Paul experienced, and Luke made them surface again during a time in the Empire after Titus had destroyed Jerusalem for Rome's sake.  Jesus tried to alter the Jews' thinking and get them to accept what God was telling them through him.  The one who called himself the Son of Man, the picture the Jews had made of God's handpicked person, and who identified himself in a number of instances as I AM, hadn't altered the Jews' track.  What a clear signal that Jews were on a whole different trajectory than Christians.  God had moved on.  The Jews had lost their standing to represent God.  Christians had received the standing to now show the world the Great I AM.
The signal is still clear.  It reminds me of what I should be in the business of doing.  I should be representing God by showing generosity to those who need it, not trying to look out for my own gain (in all areas, but money included).  People need acceptance and favor... and yes, money sometimes.  I think that more often than not, the question God asks me is, "Do I represent him or not in showering people with what they need?"  There was a countdown timer set for the Sadducees.  They let time expire without altering how they would spend the rest of their days.  Fortunately for me, my timer's still counting and I can walk through the rest of my life representing well one Lord, not two, since that is impossible.



[Introductory photo of reflection is found at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mirror_image]
[The first song is Everything I Do by Bryan Adams.  The second song is On the Throne by Kari Jobe.]
[The Greek text used for the New Testament references is the Nestle Aland 28th edition]

[Translations from Greek are my own.]